As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

The Decisive Second: What Henri Cartier-Bresson Truly Meant

The photographic grasp Henri Cartier-Bresson made some key observations about pictures, translated as “the decisive moment” which is usually (incorrectly) characterised as: “capturing an occasion that’s ephemeral and spontaneous, the place the picture represents the essence of the occasion itself.”

A lot is written concerning the psychophysical expertise of “decisive moments” however these inferences, whereas attention-grabbing and funky, aren’t what Cartier-Bresson was speaking about and the fallacious takeaway from his writing. Whereas it would seem to be a considerably educational debate, I not solely discover Cartier-Bresson’s writings to be significantly instructive at the moment but additionally that the misunderstanding undermines anybody making an attempt to be taught road pictures.

The 1952 first version of The Decisive Second by Henri Cartier-Bresson.

The e book Cartier-Bresson penned in 1952, in French, was known as Photos à la Sauvette (“Photos on the Run”) and together with an amazing portfolio of his work, is a really concise assessment of his strategy of photojournalism. It was fairly actually about taking photos in a dynamic and shifting world. He used the time period “decisive second” in his writing, with very particular which means, however the time period was appropriated because the title within the English translation and has led to a era that misses the purpose solely.

Observe: All quotations are from Cartier-Bresson’s “The Decisive Second” Simon and Schuster/Editions Verve, 1952.

The Decisive Second is Solely About Composition

Right here the decisive second is described:

If {a photograph} is to speak its topic in all its depth, the connection of type should be rigorously established. Pictures implies the popularity of a rhythm on the earth of actual issues. What the attention does is to search out and concentrate on the actual topic inside the mass of actuality… In {a photograph}, composition is the results of a simultaneous coalition, the natural coordination of parts seen by the attention. One doesn’t add composition as if it had been an afterthought superimposed on the essential topic materials, since it’s unimaginable to separate content material from type.

Composition will need to have its personal inevitability about it.

However inside motion there’s one second at which the weather in movement are in steadiness. Pictures should seize upon this second and maintain motionless the equilibrium of it. [emphasis mine]

The decisive second is a property of vantage level and framing (and naturally timing), and not concerning the quintessence of the exterior occasion. His level is that within the swirl of humanity and nature, throughout us, there are occasional fleeting moments the place shifting objects align naturally within the body.

It’s true, nevertheless, that when all these compositional parts align, the factor that you simply’re photographing can reveal one thing magical and iconic. However it is a end result of the composition. And capturing it actually can’t be achieved by means of organized considering and compelled construction— it occurs by means of intuition, of urgent the shutter launch at an prompt based mostly on instinct.

Composition should be one in every of our fixed preoccupations, however in the mean time of capturing it could actually stem solely from our instinct, for we’re out to seize the fugitive second, and all of the interrelationships concerned are on the transfer.

I discover that this demonstration of physics is an effective illustration of how shifting objects in the true world can appear chaotic and random, however periodically, in sure moments, there’s sample and concord, which rapidly dissipates (You may wish to mute the sound on this video):

The actual world clearly isn’t this structured, however these emotions underly catching “decisive moments” — the situations when objects in movement obtain visible concord.

As well as, due to this place, Cartier-Bresson makes a case in opposition to cropping — stating that if you happen to compose fastidiously in capturing, cropping gained’t create balances and concord that you simply missed. One can debate that many nice and well-known images are the results of cropping — the portrait of Stravinsky by Arnold Newman is one instance of many — however Cartier-Bresson’s need to perform this in-camera is laudable (and likewise a dig at journal editors who may crop a “good” photograph — which often kills it):

In the event you begin chopping or cropping a superb {photograph}, it means loss of life to the geometrically appropriate interaction of proportions. In addition to, it very not often occurs {that a} {photograph} which was feebly composed may be saved by reconstruction of its composition beneath the darkroom’s enlarger; the integrity of imaginative and prescient is now not there.

Henri Cartier-Bresson’s Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare (1932) is usually cited for example of his “decisive second.”

He Disses The Rule of Thirds, Golden Imply, and Different Guidelines

Importantly, Cartier-Bresson articulates why “guidelines” aren’t the best way composition is completed. And whereas the Golden Imply (and I’d add, The Rule of Thirds) is perhaps attention-grabbing for evaluation they haven’t any place in taking a photograph:

Any geometrical evaluation, any lowering of the image to a schema, may be carried out solely (due to its very nature) after the {photograph} has been taken, developed, and printed — after which it may be used just for a postmortem examination of the image. I hope we’ll by no means see the day when photograph retailers promote little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule won’t ever be discovered etched on our floor glass. [emphasis mine]

I feel Cartier-Bresson can be bummed by means of the Rule of Thirds grids which might be typically supplied in digital camera viewfinders, and totally inappropriate as foundations for instructing photographic composition.

A Dynamic State of affairs in a Single Picture

Early within the e book, he articulates his ambition to seize the essence of a dynamic state of affairs in a single picture — the supply of the misuse of “a decisive second” —

I prowled the streets all day, feeling very strung-up and able to pounce, decided to “lure” life — to protect life within the act of dwelling. Above all, I craved to grab, within the confines of 1 single {photograph}, the entire essence of some state of affairs that was within the strategy of unrolling itself earlier than my eyes.

He continues to explain a photograph “story” — a sequence of images used to cowl an occasion. That is usually conflated with the above ambition. However he’s suggesting that it might be uncommon for a single picture to convey what a sequence of photographs can.

Generally there’s one distinctive image whose composition possesses such vigor and richness, and whose content material so radiates outward from it, that this single image is a complete story in itself. However this not often occurs.

Hyères, France (1932) is one other often-cited instance of Cartier-Bresson’s “decisive second” idea.

Not Over (or Underneath) Taking pictures

He warns about overshooting; photographers must steadiness capturing a ton of images and never capturing sufficient and lacking one thing necessary. A photographer must be discriminating.

“[The real world] provide[s] such an abundance of fabric {that a} photographer should guard in opposition to the temptation of making an attempt to do all the pieces…” Cartier-Bresson writes. “It’s important to keep away from capturing like a machine-gunner and burdening your self with ineffective recordings…”

That is significantly apt at the moment, with the low friction in capturing, and shifting the burden to exhaustive post-production. In fact you don’t wish to miss the second, and positively there are topics in all places that may very well be made attention-grabbing, however he suggests this protection must be measured.

Candid Pictures for Authenticity

Cartier-Bresson discusses the significance of being surreptitious in capturing if you wish to seize one thing genuine. Keep in mind that the small high-quality digital camera was comparatively new, and so was the attraction to candid pictures, of which he was a proponent. He says:

In no matter picture-story we attempt to do, we’re sure to reach as intruders. It’s important, subsequently, to strategy the topic on tiptoe — even when the topic is still-life. A velvet hand, a hawk’s eye — these we must always all have.

He says that in case your intention to shoot is made apparent, it is advisable again off and get your topics comfy along with your presence. “When the topic is in any method uneasy, the character goes away the place the digital camera can’t attain it.”

Associated, he argues for capturing in pure mild, in order to not disturb the true scene. “And no pictures taken with the help of flashlight both, if solely out of respect of the particular mild — even when there isn’t any of it. Except a photographer observes such circumstances as these, he could change into an intolerably aggressive character.”

On Discovering Topic Matter

Cartier-Bresson makes the case that many others have made — that there isn’t any finish of doable material (and as Elliott Erwitt mentioned years later, that pictures is much less concerning the object and extra about the way you see it.)

Cartier-Bresson says “There’s topic in all that takes place on the earth…” and “In pictures, the smallest factor generally is a nice topic.” He continues “Topic doesn’t include a group of details…” which speaks to the excellence between photographing objects vs. moments. “There are millions of methods to distill the essence of one thing that captivates us.”

He goes on to element capturing portraits and faces, and in trying to seize the identification of the sitter, noting the problematic relationship with a shopper who desires “to be flattered, and the result’s now not actual.”

The Decisive Moment is taken into account one of the crucial necessary books within the twentieth century about pictures, and there are ample classes in his elegant textual content, illustrated by his historic work. However the continued misuse and misunderstanding of his classes needs to be revisited by photographic instructors.

P.S. In the event you get pleasure from this angle, I encourage you to take one in every of my workshops by means of the Santa Fe Photographic Workshops. There are 3-week on-line applications all year long, and this August there’s a particular in-person 1-week intensive that needs to be enjoyable for any inventive beginner, perhaps if you happen to’ve plateaued, really feel such as you’re good at image taking, however wish to push your self. Anyway, Thanks for listening.

Concerning the writer: Michael Rubin, previously of Lucasfilm, Netflix and Adobe, is a photographer and host of the podcast “Everyday Photography, Every Day.” The opinions expressed on this article are solely these of the writer. To see extra from Rubin, go to Neomodern or give him a observe on Instagram. This text was additionally printed here.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Professional Video Equipment & Photography Equipment
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart